Ram Jethmalani..

I always thought such turnaround in a criminal case happens only in movies but the present Jessica Lal case will seem to prove my point wrong.

A good lawyer is really necessary to defend a case but what makes them a good lawyer. Is it just their hold on making the decisions makes them good lawyer,i.e when one takes a case to a lawyer he goes through it before accepting the case and he accepts only when he is confident that it can be defendable? But is there at all any fun if one knows a priori that he is going to win the case?

The question of good lawyer apart, the hearing of the criminal cases are always interesting. As per the rule if so and so evidence is available against a accused then he is found guilty. Now what is happening in the court is, there might be several situations that might arise which is not mentioned in the constitution and how the judge will give away the judgement? This is an interesting question and that is why I sometimes feel I should taken the profession of a typewriter in a court rather than doing all these RF stuffs.....